Ceasefires

There have been at least four ceasefires (or agreements to ceasefires) in Sudan since the conflict began. (If you know of others, let me know).

September 4, 2003: Within Sudan, the SLA and the government agreed on a ceasefire. This did not last long, however, as both sides accused the other of breaking it.

April 8, 2004: Ceasefire agreement between Khartoum and the SLA and JEM. The JEM remain armed, and hostilities continue.

May 5, 2006, Ceasefire between the government and the Minni Minnawi faction of the Sudan Liberation Movement. According to BBC, however, the Sudanese government was "systematically attacking groups who had refused to sign for peace."

January 11, 2007 Sudan and rebel groups, prodded by a visiting US politician, agreed on a 60-day ceasefire. See news article

The challenge has been, however, to enforce these ceasefires. A ceasefire does not mean that the problems are over. In many cases, it is only an agreement not to fight while mediation occurs. But some groups ignore the agreement, and continue the fighting. Tension is still high, and violence is still erupting. Law forces have been set up to maintain the ceasefires while mediation occurs.

Peace Talks and Ceasefires

According to UN.org http://www.un.org/News/dh/dev/scripts/darfur_formatted.htm

September 4, 2003: Within Sudan, the SLA and the government agreeed on a ceasefire. This did not last long, however, as both sides accused the other of breaking it.

January 7, 2004: Mr. Vraalsen travels to the Chadian capital, N’Djamena, to press for the resumption of peace talks between Khartoum and the SLA and for humanitarian workers to be allowed greater access. He warns that the situation is deteriorating.

March 31, 2004:The United Nations Secretary-General, Kofi Annan issues a statement saying he is disturbed by the continuing conflict, its impact on civilians and the ongoing problems with humanitarian access. He welcomes the start of peace talks in N’Djamena.

April 2, 2004: The Security Council issues a presidential statement expressing its concern about the humanitarian situation and calling for a ceasefire.

April 8, 2004: The Secretary-General hails the signing of a humanitarian ceasefire agreement between Khartoum and the SLA and JEM. The JEM remain armed, and hostilities continue.

June 11, 2004: Adopting a resolution about plans to set up a UN mission in southern Sudan, where a peace deal is considered imminent, the Security Council calls on all parties to play their part in trying to end the fighting in Darfur.

July 3, 2004: The UN and Sudan sign a joint communiqué in which they both make pledges to alleviate the conflict in Darfur . Khartoum vows to lift all restrictions on humanitarian access, bring to justice those responsible for human rights abuses, disarm the Janjaweed, protect IDPs from further attacks and resume peace talks with the rebels. The UN promises to help the African Union (AU) quickly deploy ceasefire monitors and to provide more humanitarian relief. The two sides also agree to set up a Joint Implementation Mechanism (JIM) to monitor the agreement.

July 23, 2004: The leaders of the SLA and JEM agree to substantive peace talks with the Sudanese Government to try to resolve the conflict.

July 30, 2004:Security Council adopts resolution, 13-0 with China and Pakistan abstaining, paving the way for action against Sudan if it does not make progress on the pledges it made in the communiqué. Mr. Annan immediately welcomes the move.

August 19, 2004: African Union (AU) ceasefire monitors confirm the Sudanese military harassed and brutally treated IDPs a week ago at the Kalma camp in South Darfur and then looted the camp.

August 24, 2004: UN officials take part in AU-organized peace talks in Abuja , Nigeria , between the Sudanese Government and the SLA and JEM.

Where Does the United Nations Stand?

The UN has yet to identify the conflict as a genocide, but has taken action to stop the violence that is occuring.
On August 31, 2006, they approved Resolution 1706. This Resolution called for a UN peacekeeping force of 17,300 troops to help maintain the peace in Darfur because Sudan's peacekeeping force was not doing enough (by choice or lack of funds) to stop the fighting. Sudan is against this resolution (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Darfur_conflict).

How Long Has This Been Going On?

According to BIGpedia.com (12/09/06), the Genocide is part of the Second Sudanese Civil War, which began in 1983 (23 years so far), and is really, part two of the First Sudanese Civil War, which ran from 1955 to 1972. But the Genocide itself started in 2003.

Who's fighting?

According to Wikipedia.org, the "conflict" (that's not said to make light of the situation, but to promote fact-based, rather than emotions-based information) is occurring primarily between two groups. These are the Janjaweed (a militia group that consists of seminomadic camel-herding Arabs), against the primarily land-tilling, non-Arab tribes. The government claims it is not helping the Janjaweed, but there is evidence that they are providing weapons to this group. [personally, this surprises me- that the government would be behind a seminomadic group, which would seemingly be less economically viable than a group that has settled in one place].

How Did the Sudanese Civil War Start?

According to BIGpedia.com (12/09/06), the civil war began when power started shifting from the southern non-Arabs, to the northern Arabs. Britain had control of Sudan at that point, and had prevented the north from having positions of power in the south. The south was more wealthy because they have more oil, and more water sources. They were comfortable with their power. But the north pressured Britain long enough, that Britain gave in, and in the 1950's, the northern Arabs began to have more power than the southern non-Arabs. The south wanted to secceed from the north, but was not allowed to do so. As a result, civil unrest began.

Sites to See:

www.savedarfur.org
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Darfur_conflict
http://hrw.org/doc?t=africa&c=darfur
http://news.yahoo.com/fc/World/Sudan
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/in_depth/africa/2004/sudan/
http://web.amnesty.org/pages/sdn-index-eng
http://www.sudantribune.com/mot.php3?id_mot=26
http://www.darfurgenocide.org/
http://www.un.org/apps/news/infocusRel.asp?infocusID=88&Body=Sudan&Body1=
http://sudanwatch.blogspot.com/

Intro to Understanding the Darfur Genocide

Like many people, I tend to doubt everything I hear in the media. When I heard that there was a genocide going on in Darfur, Sudan, my first reaction was, "That must be a bunch of rhetoric," the use of words and phrases, of any techniques used to build movements, to grab the attention of others to an issue that in this case, probably was not really a big issue. Certainly, the "genocide" couldn't be so easily defined a "genocide" if we, the world, were allowing it to continue. So I spent a day investigating the issue in the spring of 2005. Since then, I have had links to that information from my webpage. But I want to know more. What is being done about it? What are the different angles on how to stop it? How far should we go in trying to stop it? What is the background behind the different political parties involved. How did the tensions evolve to begin with?
Really, I do not know much on the subject. But I intend to find out, and I'll post my findings here.

Questions?

If you have any questions about the Darfur Genocide/Conflict that you would like me to research, send a comment here. I will do my best to find out and post it on this page. Also, any information you may have, with sources included, would be greatly appreciated.

The Facts

Some of the facts:
*people are fleeing from their homes, to camps where they are living in unsafe, unhealthy conditions.
*people in the camps are falling victim to rape, beatings, etc.
*some US states have put sanctions on businesses, preventing them from dealing with Sudan in order to pressure Sudan to put a stop to the fighting.
*Sudan has been resisting political pressure from the United Nations, and many countries including the US, to provide protection to the people.
*Sudan has been resisting offers from around the world, to send in outside military or peacekeeping troops, and even offers to send in aid workers.
-whether this is pride, fear of other countries taking control, or just because the country itself does not want to help the people is not clear in the articles I've read so far.
*Sudan is slowly giving way to political pressure in some ways, but still resisting.